[ad_1]
Andreessen Horowitz is the partner of Marc Andreessen
Justin Sullivan | Getty Images
Marc Andreessen is a famous venture capitalist say That “programs are eating up the world.” When it comes to artificial intelligence, he claims that people should stop worrying, build, build, and build.
On Tuesday, Andreessen posted approx A message of 7,000 words on his views on artificial intelligence, the risks it poses, and the regulation he believes it requires. In his attempt to counter all the recent talk of “AI dominance,” he offers what might be considered a very idealistic perspective on the implications.
“don’t want to kill you”
Related investment news
Andreessen begins with a careful approach to artificial intelligence, or machine learning, and calls it “the application of mathematics and software code to teach computers how to understand, synthesize, and generate knowledge in ways similar to the way people do.”
He says that AI is not sentient, despite the fact that its ability to mimic human language can understandably fool some into believing otherwise. It is trained in human language and finds higher level patterns in that data.
“The artificial intelligence does not want, it has no goals, it does not want to kill you, because it is not alive,” he wrote. “And AI is a machine — it will never come to life more than the will of your toaster.”
Andreessen writes that there is a “wall of fearmongering and doom” in the AI world right now. Without naming names, it likely refers to claims from prominent tech leaders that technology poses an existential threat to humanity. last week, Microsoft Founder Bill Gates, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis, and others signed a letter from the Center for Artificial Intelligence Security on the “Extinction Threat from AI.”
CTOs have an incentive to promote doomsday views, Andreessen writes, because they “could make more money if regulatory barriers were erected that constituted a cartel of government-blessed AI vendors protected from emerging and new open-source competition.”
Several researchers and ethicists at Amnesty International have also criticized the doomsday narrative. One argument is that the focus is too much on the growing power of artificial intelligence and its future threats Distracts from real-life damage Caused by some algorithm to marginalized communities right now, not in an indefinite future.
But this is where most of the similarities between Andreessen and the researchers end. Andreessen writes that people in positions such as AI safety expert, AI ethicist, and AI risk researcher “are getting paid to be doomed, and their data needs to be handled appropriately,” he wrote. In fact, he has many leaders in AI research, ethics, trust, and safety They expressed clear opposition to the doomed agenda and focus instead on mitigating the documented risks of technology today.
Instead of acknowledging any documented real-life dangers of AI — its biases can be transmitted facial recognition systemsAnd Bail decisionscriminal justice procedures, Mortgage approval algorithms And more – Andreessen claims that AI can be “a way to make everything we care about better.”
He argues that AI has huge potential for productivity, scientific breakthroughs, the creative arts, and reducing death rates in wartime.
“Anything people do with their natural intelligence today could be done much better with AI,” he wrote. “And we will be able to tackle new challenges that would have been impossible to tackle without artificial intelligence, from curing all diseases to achieving interstellar travel.”
From perdition to idealism
Although artificial intelligence has made great strides in many areas, such as Develop a vaccine and chatbot services, the technology’s documented harms have led many experts to conclude that, for certain applications, it should never be used.
Andreessen calls these fears an irrational “moral panic”. He also touts a return to the tech industry’s “move fast and break things” approach of the past year, writing that both big AI companies and startups should be allowed to “build AI as fast as they can” and that the technology “will accelerate exponentially.” Quickly from here – if we allow it.”
Andreessen, who gained fame in the 1990s for developing the first popular Internet browser, started his company with Ben Horowitz in 2009. Two years later, he wrote a much-cited blog post titled “Why Software Is Awakening the World,” in which he argued that healthcare and education They were just as deserving of a “software-based fundamental transformation” as so many industries that came before them.
Eating the world is exactly what many people fear when it comes to artificial intelligence. Besides just trying to allay those fears, Andreessen says there’s work to be done. It promotes the controversial use of AI itself to protect people from AI bias and harm.
“Governments working in partnership with the private sector must engage aggressively in each potential risk area of using AI to maximize the defense capabilities of society,” he said.
In Andreessen’s idealized future, “every child will have an AI teacher who is infinitely patient, infinitely compassionate, infinitely knowledgeable, and infinitely helpful.” He expresses similar insights into the role of AI as a partner and collaborator to every person, scientist, educator, CEO, government leader, and even military commander.
Is China the real threat?
Toward the end of his position, Andreessen points to what he calls “the very real danger that AI is not pursuing full force and speed.”
That danger, he says, is China, which is rapidly developing artificial intelligence and with very troubling authoritarian applications. According to years of documented cases, the Chinese government relies on AI for surveillance, such as using facial recognition and phone GPS data. To track and identify protesters.
To avoid the spread of AI’s impact in China, Andreessen wrote, “We must push AI into our economy and society as quickly as possible.”
Then he lays out a plan to massively develop AI on behalf of big tech companies and start-ups and using “the full power of our private sector, our scientific establishment, and our governments.”
Andreessen writes with a level of certainty about where the world is headed, but he’s not always great at predicting what’s to come.
His company launched a $2.2 billion crypto fund in mid-2021, shortly before the industry began to crash. One of its big bets during the pandemic has been social audio startup Clubhouse, which has soared to $4 billion while people are stuck at home looking for alternative forms of entertainment. In April, Clubhouse said it was laying off half of its staff in order to “reset” the company.
Throughout Andreessen’s piece, he invokes the ulterior motives of others when it comes to publicly expressing their opinions on AI. But he has his own. He wants to make money from the AI revolution, and is investing in startups with that goal in mind.
“I don’t think they are reckless or evil,” he concluded. “They are heroes, every single one. My company and I are thrilled to support as many of them as possible, and we will stand by them and their work 100%.”
He watches: CNBC interview with Altimeter Capital’s Brad Gerstner
[ad_2]
