[ad_1]
The OpenAI logo on the website displayed on a phone screen and ChatGPT on the AppStore displayed on a phone screen in this pictogram taken in Krakow, Poland on June 8, 2023.
Jacob Borzycki | Norphoto | Getty Images
Two authors He sued against Open AI Last week they alleged that their copyrighted books were used to train the company’s artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT, without their consent.
Paul Tremblay, author of “The Cabin at the End of the World,” and Mona Awad, author of “Bunny” and “13 Ways of Seeing at a Fat Girl,” claim that ChatGPT generates “extremely accurate summaries” of works, as per the complaint. They claim abstracts are “only possible” if ChatGPT is trained on their books, which is a violation of copyright law.
OpenAI did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. Lawyers for Tremblay and Awad did not immediately respond.
ChatGPT automatically generates text based on typed prompts in a way that is more advanced and creative than the chatbots of Silicon Valley’s past. The technology was developed by San Francisco-based OpenAI, a research company led by Sam Altman and supported by Microsoft.
The chatbot is trained on a huge amount of text data. OpenAI does not disclose the exact data that was used to train ChatGPT, but the company does He says In general, he crawled the web, including using archived books and Wikipedia.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco, alleges that “much” of the material in OpenAI’s training data is based on copyrighted material, including Tremblay and Awad’s books. But establishing exactly how and where ChatGPT extracted this information, as well as whether the authors suffered financial damages, can be challenging.
Complaint references Exhibitions From the summaries generated by ChatGPT, and it is noted that the chatbot gets a few things wrong. Awad and Tremblay claim that the rest of the abstracts are accurate, which means that “ChatGPT retains knowledge of certain actions in the training dataset”.
“At no time did ChatGPT reproduce any of the Plaintiffs’ copyright administration information included in their published works,” the complaint states.
[ad_2]
