[ad_1]
The Calcutta High Court said on Wednesday that Panchayat Elections in West Bengal The announcement of the results will be subject to his final orders regarding matters he hears of allegations of electoral malpractice on polling day.
The court made several interventions since the start of the electoral process:
June 12: The Division said the five days provided for nominations by the State Elections Commission (SEC) were insufficient at first glance, but eventually confirmed the next day that it would not direct the SEC to push back polling dates.
June 15: Another divisional seat, in separate appeals by BJP leader Sofindu Adhikari and Congress leader Adhir Chowdhury, has directed the SEC to forfeit the central forces of all districts within 48 hours for the panchayat elections.
June 22: The court criticized the SEC for appropriating insufficient central powers.
June 24: One judge overturned the order of the National Human Rights Commission, deputizing the Director General (Investigations) as a special observer for human rights in polling stations.
June 27: Noting that the election of candidates unchallenged has a detrimental effect on the right to choose voters, one judge ordered the SEC to reconsider its decision to declare the candidates as ‘elected unchallenged’, after dropping the names of the other candidates from the final list. of candidates in Bhangar, citing delays in submitting nomination papers.
July 6: The Seat Division ordered the Central Troops to remain in the state for 10 days after the results were announced on 12 July.
July 12: The court says the announcement of the results will be subject to its final orders on matters it hears on the ballot. The case for hearing was posted on July 19. Petitions before the Supreme Court include allegations of widespread violence and electoral malpractice, and an appeal to re-ballot at some 50,000 booths. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has ordered recycling in just 696 cabins.
[ad_2]
