[ad_1]

A Vulcan missile for the Cert-1 mission stands at SLC-41 during testing at Cape Canaveral, Fla., May 12, 2023.

United Launch Alliance

CNBC’s Space Investing Newsletter offers a FifthGet involved in space exploration and privatization, delivered straight to your inbox. CNBC’s Michael Sheetz reports on the latest news, investor updates, and exclusive interviews on the top companies reaching new heights. Sign up to receive future releases.

Overview: Gain acceptance

There’s a reason they say “that’s why we test.” I’ve seen that a lot in my signals the past few days. Unfortunately, it crucially ignores that tests occur for various reasons.

Let’s get into that, especially in light The recently revealed explosion of a BE-4 rocket engine during a Blue Origin test in Texas. The engine was destined for the second launch of the United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan rocket.

It is worth understanding the three main phases of rocket engine testing: development, qualification, and acceptance. Industry professional with over ten years of experience in this type of test Post a helpful summary about how these phases differ. here ll; Dr. version:

  1. Development: Prototypes and smaller versions of the engine. You push them hard, and accept failure as part of the process of finding boundaries and flaws.
  2. Qualification: Basically final design. You are now checking the engine power margins. Engine destruction may happen, but it shouldn’t be common.
  3. Acceptance: A production engine being screened for launch. You might nudge it a bit as necessary to launch, but it’s not hard and tumble anymore, because you make sure it’s good.

Not every rocket engine explodes. Most people I’ve heard of are in the first two stages. But more importantly, the BE-4 is years behind schedule (the first aviation engines were contracted for delivery in 2017), and this was the third production engine. Of course, it’s better to lose an engine in a test than in a launch, especially on a rocket that can’t lose an engine for success, but that’s a very dismissive way of viewing the loss of expensive production hardware—not to mention another setback.

Downstream effects are why this is particularly important. The first pair of BE-4 engines recently passed a critical test on Vulcan for the first time. ULA CEO Tory Bruno insists that it is “very unlikely” that the incident will push back the schedule for Cert-1, currently scheduled for the fourth quarter. (Bruno will sit down with the reporters Thursday for a roundtable, which was on the schedule before the BE-4 incident was announced. I’ll be listening — so stay tuned for any other possible details on the Vulcan situation.)

But ULA doesn’t just need a Cert-1 to fly: The company needs a Vulcan to successfully complete two launches before the US Space Force can sign it up for valuable national security missions. SpaceX dominates the launch market and many in the industry, both competitors and customers, fear a monopoly. All six of ULA’s recently designated Space Force missions are scheduled to fly on Vulcan, since the company’s currently operational rockets are being retired.

So maybe this doesn’t affect Cert-1, but what about Cert-2? Bruno believes that the failure of the BE-4 acceptance test does not affect previous qualification tests carried out by Blue Origin. Even if they don’t need to rehabilitate the engine, they still need to close the investigation – Blue Origin says they’ve already found a possible cause of the explosion – check future production engines for the same faults or defects, and alternate testing.

As one payment engineer wrote on social media: “You learn a lot in development testing. You learn little in qualifying testing. Blessed are those who continue to learn in acceptance testing.”

Which brings us to another refrain I’ve seen in my signs the past few days: “Space is hard.” It’s more like “thoughts and prayers” these days.

what’s up

industry maneuvers

  • Dish And EchoStar It is said about the analysis of a possible merger, a move that would see Charlie Ergen re-merge the companies after the latter was dismantled 15 years ago. – Traffic lights
  • Private equity and defense firms buy Ball Aerospace, which CNBC previously reported is for sale from parent company Ball. According to a report, Blackstone and Veritas Capital are competing against defense firms BAE Systems, General Dynamics and Textron for the acquisition of Ball Aerospace. – Reuters
  • HawkEye 360 ​​satellite intelligence project raises $58 million from BlackRock, as well as Manhattan Venture Partners, Insight Partners, Night Dragon, Strategic Development Fund (SDF), Razors Edge, Alumni Ventures, and Adage Capital. The company plans to use the funds to develop new systems and expand its analytics capabilities, especially to “support high-value defense missions.” The company currently has 21 satellites in orbit. – HawkEye 360
  • Satellite propulsion company Benchmark Space Systems raises $33 million, in from unnamed investors. CEO Ryan McDevitt said the increase was “not directly related” to the Vermont-based company’s recent layoffs. – Space news
  • Axiom and Collins each awarded $5 million in contracts for NASA spacesuits that fall within the scope of deals previously granted by the Agency. The new awards are intended to fund Axiom’s development of a spacesuit for use in low Earth orbit, and Collins’ development of a spacesuit for use on the lunar surface. – NASA
  • HawkEye 360 ​​has awarded Australian hunting monitoring contractsFor an undisclosed amount. The contract is part of Australia’s pilot program to improve marine awareness across the country and surrounding islands. – HawkEye 360

market drivers

boldly go

In sight

[ad_2]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *